Tag: sound design

  • Oine Interview: Oine on Gen Human, Sonic Storytelling, and Sculpting Sound in Space

    Oine Interview: Oine on Gen Human, Sonic Storytelling, and Sculpting Sound in Space

    Oine shapes poetic electronic worlds where analog synths, field textures, and emotional precision meet—and Gen Human is his most focused statement yet: compact, intense, and deeply human at the core.

    Oine
    Oine

    Introduction

    Q: For those who don’t know you yet: how would you describe yourself as an artist today—and what role do sonic storytelling and emotion play in the way you write and produce?

    Oine: These are difficult questions to answer. For me, making music is tied to a long-standing search: the feeling of awe in front of something I’ve created myself. It’s something that has been with me since childhood. I remember experiencing it while building spaceships or structures with Lego—those moments when something imagined takes shape and, in a way, surprises you.

    I find it hard to identify with the label of “artist.” It feels less like an identity and more like a process: exploring, experimenting, and getting closer to that feeling.

    As for sonic storytelling, there was an experience that deeply shaped my understanding of composition. I went to see a Cirque du Soleil performance, and I was struck by how, between scenes, the actors and technicians would subtly transform the stage through small changes in lighting, objects, and positioning. If you weren’t paying close attention, you would barely notice that you had moved into a completely different scene and narrative.

    That idea has strongly influenced how I approach transitions in my tracks: gradually altering small elements in an almost subliminal way until, without realizing it, you’ve entered a new phase of the piece. I aim for that shift to feel fluid, organic, almost invisible—yet with a clear emotional impact.

    Q: You have classical training as a pianist, yet your music lives in the space between ambient, downtempo, and experimental electronica. Looking back, was there a defining moment when you realized you wanted to tell stories through electronic sound rather than more traditional forms?

    Oine: My earliest conscious memories are tied to music. One of the first I can access is of myself at around four or five years old, listening to ABBA before going to sleep on a small portable radio I kept in my bed. I remember my mother coming into the room to ask me to please turn it off.

    My deeper approach to music came through a structured education—first in music schools and later at the conservatory, where the focus was mainly on the classical repertoire. However, I never lost my fascination with contemporary productions—hip-hop, metal, and the IDM of the time. I always had an ear searching for sounds that felt different, yet still worked, to the point where I developed something close to an obsession—not so much with music itself, but with production, and with what makes each artist, each genre, and each track sound unique.

    I think it was precisely because of this that moving into production felt like a natural step. And it still does today, driven by a clear purpose: to find that balance between musical content and a truly distinctive sound.

    Latest Work

    Q: Please introduce Gen Human in your own words. What is this album to you—and how would you like listeners to approach it?

    Oine: Gen Human is my attempt to take my production one step further in terms of maturity. Until this work, I felt my music had a somewhat naïve quality—an almost childlike resonance. I don’t see that as excessive self-criticism; rather, I understand that there was a part of me that needed to express itself in that way.

    With Gen Human, the intention behind each track was to project perhaps a more adult, more restrained version of myself… although I’m not sure I can fully define it.

    I would like listeners to come across my music almost by chance and, in that encounter, discover something original. I don’t think there is an ideal way to listen to it; any approach is valid.

    Q: The title Gen Human is described as more than a name—it’s a statement of intent, a search for what is essentially human. What emotional or conceptual thread did you keep returning to while making this record?

    Oine: The album title came after it was finished. In reality, there is very little “human” about the narrative of the record in a literal sense: there are no vocals processed to the point of sounding non-human, and hardly any passages or instrumentation that evoke earthly landscapes.

    In that sense, Gen Human almost works as irony, or even as the identification of something that is, paradoxically, barely present within the album itself.

    I found it interesting that a visual artist created a video for the track Inside, one of the singles, where different robots appear and no humans at all. I think that approach captured well a part of the essence that led me to create the album.

    Creative Approach

    Oine
    Oine

    Q: This album shifts the balance: tension, rhythm, and force move to the foreground, while your ambient side remains present. How did you shape the contrast between the brutal and the subtle, the technological and the organic, so it still feels like one coherent world?

    Oine: I appreciate how you describe what you found in the album; in a sense, you’re putting it into words that feel very close to how I would like to understand it myself.

    The short answer would be: I don’t fully know.

    I suppose the premise was to try to build a sonic flow that could feel recognizable to anyone in terms of order, continuity, coherence, and sequence—even if the elements that make up that flow are not necessarily familiar to the human ear.

    Nature, from our perspective, manifests itself as both brutal and subtle at the same time. I imagine that part of me wanted to translate that same quality, but through non-natural components.

    Q: A core decision was brevity—no track exceeds 3:44. What did this limitation change in your writing and editing process? And how do you keep depth when you deliberately remove unnecessary material?

    Oine: Many of the tracks were originally longer. My wife, who is Gen Z, always gives me the same feedback whenever I show her a project: “Make it shorter.” And, in part, I took her advice.

    I’ve also noticed that my own attention span has decreased over the years, although I’m not sure whether that’s due to age or the way we consume content today.

    I wanted to embrace that reality rather than resist it and concentrate the tracks’ intensity and informational density. For me, it was actually a fun process: shortening the pieces, refining what was essential, and working on the transitions between sections in a way that could remain engaging while still bringing a sense of surprise.

    Personal & Creativity

    Q: The album is inspired by a very specific aesthetic universe: brutalist architecture fused with nature, plus sci-fi and the narrative worlds of Hideo Kojima. How do visual references like these translate into concrete musical choices?

    Oine: During much of the album’s production, I was playing several Kojima games, including entries in the Metal Gear series and Death Stranding. His visual and narrative universe has deeply inspired me since I was a child.

    I think what draws me most to his work is the blend of mystery, technology, and a certain sense of human decline that runs through many of his stories. I feel that Kojima builds worlds and moments that disrupt our understanding of reality, both aesthetically and conceptually.

    I would say that this same philosophy is what I tried to translate into Gen Human: the creation of environments where the organic and the technological intertwine in strange, sometimes almost unrecognizable ways, yet still coexist within the same sonic space.

    Q: You split the album into two energies: four ambient pieces and five more rhythmic tracks. How did you decide which ideas belonged to which side—and what connects them emotionally?

    Oine: I imagine that the intention behind intertwining both energies within the album—without separating it into something like a rhythmic “side A” and an ambient “side B”—was rooted in the idea of inhaling and exhaling throughout the record itself.

    The goal was to balance moments of expansion with more intimate ones, so the album could feel like a living organism, constantly breathing and transforming.

    Q: When self-doubt or creative silence shows up, what helps you move through it—especially when you’re aiming for such precise, distilled forms?

    Oine: I suppose this is where one of the biggest conflicts I have when making music comes in: on the one hand, there is the urgency to finish the tracks, and on the other, what that very urgency ends up doing to the music itself.

    What has helped me the most in moving through blocks and refining the work has been precisely introducing a kind of internal mantra: “Calm down, there’s no rush; tomorrow, or whenever it comes back, we’ll continue working on it.”

    Inspiration & Listening

    Q: Which artists or albums have inspired you most recently—and what did they unlock in you creatively?

    Oine: The usual suspects for me would be Max Cooper, Rival Consoles, Janus Rasmussen, Jon Hopkins, Arca, Skrillex, Catching Flies, Low Roar, and Reid Willis, to name a few.

    I’d say they all share a certain refusal to settle for what is already established, along with a constant drive to push further into newer, more personal sonic territories.

    Q: If you could recommend one piece of music—any genre—that everyone should listen to at least once, what would it be, and why?

    Oine: Enigma by Thomas Lemmer and Oine.

    Creative Philosophy & Vision

    Q: Your work often balances intuition and technique—granular detail, but also emotional immediacy. When you’re producing, how do you know when to stop refining and keep the raw emotional truth intact?

    Oine: I’m a bit surprised by some of your questions, because when I try to think of the answers, nothing really comes to mind immediately.

    I suppose it’s not so much that I stop refining, if that makes sense, but rather that I keep refining until the emotion appears—or until, in the process, I end up completely dissolving it. The latter actually happens quite often: many discarded ideas within projects are due to this.

    Sometimes an idea captures an emotion in its most initial state, but when I try to give it a more finished or refined form, that emotion disappears, and the material stops making sense within the work. In some cases, this has even led to abandoning entire projects.

    Q: If there were no limits—no budget, deadlines, or technical restrictions—what would your dream project be right now?

    Oine: This is a question I’ve often asked myself. I suppose that in this case, my dream would be to take on almost the role of an editor or assembler: bringing together multiple artists or instrumentalists to create my own libraries of all kinds of sonic elements, and then building tracks from that material.

    I would also like to work with arrangers who could shape and refine the structure of the pieces. In that environment, my role would be more of a creative director, guiding the overall process and the project’s broader vision.

    What you mention about giving it a visual identity would be truly enriching, as well as being able to rely on people specialized in music promotion, so that the work could reach the people who might actually enjoy the project.

    From Silence to Sound – Creative Identity

    Oine
    Oine

    Q: I often explore how personal decisions shape a musician’s signature sound. Which choices do you feel most strongly define your sound?

    Oine: I imagine that what I enjoy working on the most—and what ultimately ends up shaping my sound—is building sonic structures in terms of the positioning of elements within space.

    Sometimes I try to imagine sounds as solid entities within that space, as if a sculptor were working with physical matter. Other times, I feel more like someone sculpting air and vibration. In both cases, the intention is the same: to shape the audio, to construct geometries and forms out of sound.

    Q: Looking back, what were the biggest turning points that changed how you make music—and how did they shape the mindset behind Gen Human?

    Oine: I’m not sure to what extent my industry experience has actually changed the way I make music. I suppose they must have had some influence, of course, but I feel my evolution is more the result of a gradual maturation process.

    Over time, I’ve gained more experience, discovered more music, and become clearer about how to achieve the sonic results I’m looking for. In the end, it’s a matter of years spent dedicating time and passion to music production, which gradually shapes and refines the language—sometimes through addition, by layering new elements, and other times through subtraction, by removing what isn’t necessary.

    Closing

    Q: Gen Human is described as an album that breathes identity—not built to fit trends, but to speak honestly. What do you hope listeners feel or take away from it?

    Oine: I would love for the listener to find my proposal interesting, to feel something new when listening to it, and to sense that there is a clear intention to present something different behind it.

    I hope it can work as a space that activates imagination, that invites the listener to build mental scenarios, and that, in some way, can inspire something in whoever listens to it.

    Q: Finally, what’s next for you after Gen Human—do you feel drawn to push further into rhythmic territories, go deeper into pure ambient, explore more conceptual storytelling, or open a completely new chapter?

    Oine: The reality is that I don’t know. The album received very good reviews in certain circles, which was gratifying for me, but it was also quite difficult to position within genre-specific contexts and playlists. It is a genre album that, paradoxically, doesn’t fully fit into any genre, which made its promotion more challenging.

    I suppose what I feel drawn to now is to ground the conceptual side in something more identifiable or classifiable, to reach a wider audience as well. It’s important to explore one’s own limits, but it’s equally important to allow works to find recognizable spaces from which they can be heard.

  • What 10 Artist Interviews Taught Me About Creativity in Music Production

    What 10 Artist Interviews Taught Me About Creativity in Music Production

    When I started building the interview section of From Silence to Sound, I wanted it to be more than a collection of artist profiles. I wanted it to become a place where creative patterns reveal themselves.

    Every artist arrives with a different background, a different set of tools, and a different musical language. Some work with guitars, some with synths, some with vocals, some with lo-fi textures or cinematic atmospheres. But beneath those differences, certain truths keep returning.

    Again and again, the same deeper themes appear: trust your instincts, leave room for imperfection, protect your individuality, and keep listening for what a piece of music actually wants to become.

    After ten interviews, one thing has become very clear to me: creativity in music production is rarely about having more options. More often, it is about having more clarity.

    Here are ten lessons these conversations brought into focus.

    Interview
    Photo by David von Diemar on Unsplash

    1. A strong artistic voice often begins with quiet confidence

    One of the most beautiful recurring ideas across these interviews is that not every artist is trying to be louder, bigger, or more dramatic. Sometimes the real power lies in restraint.

    That came through strongly in conversations about reduced sound, atmosphere, and emotional subtlety. There is a kind of confidence in not over-explaining your music. In letting a track breathe. In trusting that a fragile texture, a small melodic gesture, or a carefully chosen sound can carry more emotional truth than a dense arrangement ever could.

    For producers, this is an important reminder. You do not always need to prove how much you can do. Sometimes your identity is strongest when you let the essential elements stand on their own.

    2. Creativity grows when you stop trying to sound like “everyone”

    Many artists develop their most interesting work when they stop chasing external expectations. Not because they stop learning from others, but because they begin filtering inspiration through their own experience.

    That is a distinction worth paying attention to. Inspiration is healthy. Copying is limiting. The moment you try to sound generically current, you risk removing the very thing that could make your music memorable.

    Several interviews pointed back to this in different ways: through emotional honesty, through unusual combinations of influences, and through a willingness to follow personal instincts rather than formulas. That is where artistic identity begins. Not in theory, but in choices.

    Your signature sound is rarely something you invent all at once. It is something that appears over time when you repeatedly choose what feels true to you.

    3. Consistency matters more than waiting for perfect inspiration

    Creativity is often romanticized as something mysterious that arrives when the mood is right. But many experienced artists know that momentum is built differently.

    Creative consistency does not mean forcing masterpieces every day. It means staying in dialogue with your craft. Showing up. Experimenting. Finishing sketches. Returning to ideas. Making space for the work even when inspiration feels distant.

    This mindset is powerful because it removes unnecessary drama from the process. Music becomes less about rare moments of brilliance and more about an ongoing relationship with listening, shaping, refining, and discovering.

    In practical terms, this may be one of the most valuable lessons for producers: the habit of creating often matters more than the occasional burst of motivation.

    4. Emotion should lead; technique should support

    Across very different musical styles, another truth kept surfacing: technique matters, but emotion is what gives music meaning.

    Production skills are essential. Sound design matters. Arrangement matters. Mixing matters. Song structure matters. But none of those things can replace emotional direction. A beautifully produced track without emotional intent may be impressive, but it will rarely stay with the listener.

    The strongest artists tend to understand this instinctively. They use technical skill not as the center of the work, but as a framework that helps the feeling come across more clearly.

    That is an important shift in perspective for producers, especially when working inside a DAW for long hours. It is easy to get absorbed in the details and forget the question that matters most: what is this track trying to say?

    5. Rough edges can make music feel more human

    Perfection is one of the great temptations of modern production. We can edit endlessly, polish every transient, correct every fluctuation, align every note, and remove every trace of unpredictability.

    But in many of these interviews, there is a clear appreciation for what happens when music retains some texture, some irregularity, some sign of life.

    A rough edge is not automatically a flaw. Sometimes it is the very thing that makes a track believable. It can create intimacy. It can preserve personality. It can remind the listener that there is a human being behind the sound.

    This does not mean craft becomes unimportant. It means craft should serve expression rather than sterilize it. The goal is not to make music careless. The goal is to avoid removing its pulse.

    6. Space is not emptiness — it is part of the composition

    This is one of the most important lessons for any producer working with dense sessions and unlimited possibilities. Space is not what is left over when you have not finished the arrangement. Space is an active, creative decision.

    Several artists spoke, directly or indirectly, about restraint, atmosphere, and the power of leaving things unsaid. That applies to melody, rhythm, harmony, sound design, and structure.

    When everything is filled, nothing stands out. When there is no contrast, nothing breathes. When every moment is maximized, emotional depth can flatten.

    Good use of space creates tension, clarity, elegance, and focus. It gives a listener somewhere to enter the music. It lets a sound carry weight. It turns silence into meaning.

    7. Place, memory, and lived experience shape the sound more than gear does

    It is easy for producers to focus heavily on tools. Which synth, which plug-in, which microphone, which workflow, which setup. Tools do matter. But the interviews repeatedly suggest that the deeper source material comes from somewhere else.

    Place. Memory. Mood. Personal history. Curiosity. Emotional timing. These are often what give a piece its inner world.

    That is why two artists can use similar tools and still create completely different music. The software may be the same, but the emotional references are not. One producer is translating solitude. Another is translating motion. Another is capturing nostalgia, tension, hope, contrast, or reflection.

    The lesson here is liberating: your creative depth does not depend on owning more equipment. It depends on learning how to listen more closely to your own experience.

    8. Contrast gives music character

    One theme I found especially compelling is contrast: soft and strong, polished and raw, movement and stillness, melody and texture, discipline and freedom.

    Music becomes more interesting when it contains a conversation between opposites. Without contrast, even beautiful sound can become one-dimensional.

    This also applies to the creative process itself. Many artists seem to develop their best work not by staying in one emotional or technical mode, but by letting different energies interact. Instinct with craft. Structure with spontaneity. Planning with surprise.

    For producers, contrast is not just a compositional tool. It is also a creative principle. Sometimes the breakthrough comes when you stop trying to smooth everything into one consistent surface and instead allow different qualities to coexist.

    9. Discipline is creative, not restrictive

    The word discipline can sound dry in artistic contexts, but it deserves reclaiming. In several interviews, discipline appears not as the opposite of creativity, but as one of its strongest allies.

    Discipline helps you return to work. It helps you finish. It helps you refine an idea until it becomes coherent. It helps you build a body of work instead of a folder full of unfinished beginnings.

    Creative freedom without any discipline can remain vague. Discipline without freedom can become rigid. The art lies in combining both.

    This is especially relevant today, when distraction is everywhere, and producers are exposed to constant streams of content, comparison, and new tools. The ability to stay with your own process and to keep shaping your work over time is a profound advantage.

    10. The best music often comes from honesty, not strategy

    Perhaps the deepest lesson of all is this: the most lasting music rarely begins with strategy alone. It begins with honesty.

    Honesty in songwriting. Honesty in sound. Honesty in mood. Honesty in accepting what kind of artist you are — and what kind of artist you are not.

    That honesty may sound intimate and vulnerable, or cinematic and expansive, or minimal and calm. It may arrive in a pop song, an ambient piece, a lo-fi track, or an instrumental work. The form can change completely. But the listener usually recognizes when something real is present.

    Of course, strategy has its place. Releasing music well matters. Presenting it well matters. Communicating your work matters. But strategy becomes much more powerful when there is something genuine at its center.

    And that, more than anything else, is what these interviews keep pointing back to.

    Take These Ideas Further in
    From Silence to Sound

    Many of the themes in this article — artistic identity, creative clarity, discipline, emotion, and finding your own voice — are explored in much greater depth in my book From Silence to Sound: Unlocking Creativity in Music Production.

    Final Thoughts

    If I had to reduce all ten interviews to one shared message, it would be this: creativity in music production is not about becoming more impressive. It is about becoming more truthful.

    Truthful in your sound choices. Truthful in your process. Truthful in your influences. Truthful in what you leave in, and what you leave out.

    The artists I spoke with work in different genres and follow different paths, yet they all reflect something essential about making meaningful music: clarity, individuality, and emotional honesty matter.

    For me, that is one of the most rewarding things about these conversations. They do not just reveal how other artists work. They also remind me, again and again, what really matters in my own creative life.

    And maybe that is one of the most valuable roles an interview can play. Not just to inform, but to help us hear ourselves more clearly.

  • Glint Interview: Glint on Hope, Quiet Strength, and the Art of Reduced Sound

    Glint Interview: Glint on Hope, Quiet Strength, and the Art of Reduced Sound

    Glint is the atmospheric electronic project of Martin Stehl, blending ambient air, chillout pulse, and cinematic detail into warm, emotionally direct sound. With roots in decades of production across pop, house, and electronic music, he now focuses on music that turns landscape, memory, and motion into immersive listening experiences.

    Glint

    Introduction

    Q: For those who don’t know you yet: how would you describe Glint in a few sentences—and what kind of emotional space do you want your music to open for listeners?

    Glint: Glint brings together different musical influences and forms something of its own. Sometimes the music is very reduced and clear; at other times, it is multilayered and full of fine details. I’m fascinated by this interplay between simplicity and depth, and by the blending of different genres. What moves me most is when listeners tell me that my music affects them deeply.

    Q: Your career began in the 1990s with pop and house production, long before Glint became your cinematic instrumental outlet. What were the key turning points that led you from the club-oriented world into these quieter, more atmospheric soundscapes?

    Glint: Good question. I’m also drawn to storytelling—music that not only works in the moment or in a club context, but also carries a narrative. Glint ultimately emerged from that process—not as a conscious break, but more as a natural evolution of what has always interested me musically, yet had not fully come to the surface before.

    Latest Work

    Q: Hope is your fourth studio album—and it’s the first time piano-based compositions step into the spotlight. How would you describe this album in your own words, and where does it sit in your evolution as Glint?

    Glint: Through the piano compositions, a new stylistic and sonic layer emerges—distinct melodic themes, reduced to a few instruments and clear structures. For me, this is an important step in my development with Glint—a kind of condensation in which I try even more to create depth and atmosphere with minimal means.

    Q: The press text says, “Sometimes hope is not born out loud, but in silence.” While making Hope, what emotional or conceptual thread did you keep returning to—and what does “hope” mean to you in sound?

    Glint: For me, with “Hope,” there was always this feeling that hope is not something loud or imposing. It is something fragile that emerges between the notes. The thread running through it was not a straight path, but more of a circling motion. In sound, hope does not mean a radiant resolution. It is more like a floating chord that never fully resolves—an open space in which something can emerge.

    Creative Approach

    Q: Hope feels deliberately reduced: warm, organic, and spacious, with subtle electronics supporting the core ideas. How did you approach writing, sound design, and arrangement for this album—and what did you do differently compared to Estival Arvo, Human, or The Beginning?

    Glint: This time, I wrote everything on the piano and then created the sounds I imagined for it. When arranging, I rely on intuition. I often have a sense of the spaces where things will happen. In contrast to my previous albums, I only used the DAW when there was no other option.

    Personal & Creativity-Related

    Glint

    Q: Do you have a routine or ritual that helps you stay inspired—especially when you’re working with subtle emotions and minimal elements? Or do your best ideas come from spontaneity?

    Glint: Often, an idea doesn’t arise at the instrument or in the studio, but from an impulse in daily life that triggers a melody, a chord progression, or a rhythmic pattern. Ideas emerge in quiet environments—when I isolate myself. I experiment mentally with melodies and basslines, and I can already hear certain aspects of an arrangement. I don’t write things down—good ideas are not forgotten. When the time comes, I develop them concretely on my instruments and move into the production phase, where I start working quite early with synthetic sounds and sound design.

    Q: How do you deal with creative blocks, self-doubt, or periods of silence—when the studio suddenly feels empty instead of inspiring?

    Glint: Well, as often happens, there are tunes that don’t fit the format or ideas that lead nowhere. Then I usually take a few days off and return to the studio with fresh ears. Most of the time, I know how to continue quickly.

    Inspiration & Listening

    Q: Which artists or albums have inspired you most recently—and what exactly about them sparked you?

    Glint: Recently, I listened to Joni Mitchell’s jazz album “Both Sides Now.” It features beautiful orchestral arrangements of well-known jazz pieces, reworked by Vince Mendoza.

    Q: If you could recommend one piece of music—any genre—that everyone should listen to at least once, what would it be, and why?

    Glint: Bach—“Air” (Orchestral Suite No. 3 in D major, 2nd movement). It is incredibly beautiful and, to me, it has a spiritual energy.

    Creative Philosophy & Vision

    Q: What role do experimentation and risk-taking play in your music today? For example: shifting from “more elements” to “less,” introducing piano as a lead voice, or letting a track stay fragile instead of ‘fixing’ it.

    Glint: Experimentation is very valuable to me—this is often where interesting ideas emerge. It means taking unconventional paths in music—melodies that unfold slowly, harmonies that don’t follow the expected course. It’s about breaking down familiar patterns and exploring what lies beneath them.

    From Silence to Sound – Creative Identity

    Glint
    Glint

    Q: I often explore how personal decisions shape a musician’s signature sound. Which choices most strongly define yours—your harmonic language, your relationship to groove, your instrument palette (piano/textures), your mix aesthetics, your sense of space?

    Glint: I try to see and hear everything. It’s the whole picture—the interplay of melody, bass, harmony, and rhythmic intricacies—that fascinates me, especially in more complex music that requires more elements. In those moments, I feel more like an arranger filling in the gaps than an instrumentalist.

    Closing

    Q: What do you hope listeners feel or take away when they experience Hope—especially on days when they need calm, reflection, or a reset?

    Glint: The album invites reflection and, hopefully, conveys to listeners the feeling that hope is still possible.

    Q: If you could give one piece of advice to someone at the beginning of their creative journey, what would it be?

    Glint: I think you should be open to all styles and try out what you enjoy most. Personally, I approach music with joy. You should love engaging with music—and I simply cannot get enough of it.

    Q: Finally, what’s next for Glint—after Hope? What should we be looking forward to?

    Glint: Well, if I knew that… it will continue, so let’s be surprised.

  • Thomas Foster Interview: Thomas Foster on Sonic Branding, EDM Craft, and Teaching Creativity at Scale

    Thomas Foster Interview: Thomas Foster on Sonic Branding, EDM Craft, and Teaching Creativity at Scale

    Thomas Foster creates emotionally direct electronic music and world-class broadcast sound branding—balancing hook craft, orchestration, and modern sound design while teaching thousands of producers along the way.

    Thomas Foster

    Introduction

    Q: For people discovering you for the first time: how would you describe yourself as an artist—and how do you balance your worlds of solo releases, sonic branding, and education?

    Thomas: I started making music when I was six years old, and by the time I was twelve, I already had a clear vision: I wanted to become a music producer. Since then, I’ve been working toward that goal. In my early twenties, I had my first successes with Hitradio Ö3, Austria’s only major pop radio station at the time. What shaped me early on was that I was never focused on just one lane. One day I’d produce a commercial that had to sound a certain way, the next day a radio jingle with completely different requirements, and then music for children’s television—again, with a totally different aesthetic. I realized quite early that I actually love this process of stepping into a musical style I’ve never worked in before, understanding it, and then trying to recreate it as authentically as possible. That mindset still defines my work as an artist today. On Spotify, which for a long time was more of a side project but has become much more important to me in recent years, I’m still very much a chameleon. I might produce a trance track one day, and a chillout track the next—or deep house, EDM, hyper techno, or even a full Christmas album inspired by the sound of 1970s orchestral recordings. Of course, that makes it harder to build a traditional fanbase, because people who love one track might not connect with the next. But interestingly, the place where everything comes together is my YouTube channel. There, I’ve built a community that doesn’t follow me for one specific sound, but for the idea behind it—the curiosity, the exploration, and the willingness to try different things. In a way, that’s where the consistency lies. Even though the music changes, the intention behind it stays the same. That’s probably the most honest version of who I am as an artist.

    Q: You started on piano early and studied composition at the Mozarteum as a teenager. What were the biggest formative moments that shaped your musical instincts—and when did you realize production could become your life’s work?

    Thomas: My relationship with piano lessons was quite complicated for a long time. On one hand, I knew very early—around the age of six—that I wanted to become a musician. At first, that probably meant something like becoming the next Michael Jackson. Later, around twelve, that vision became more concrete: I wanted to be a music producer. But the piano education I received was rooted in classical music—Bach, Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven. Honestly, that world didn’t connect with me at all. I wanted to be able to play the piano, but I didn’t want to practice it that way. I felt no emotional connection to that repertoire. When I was sixteen, I told my parents that I didn’t want to play Mozart and Beethoven anymore—I wanted to play The Beatles and Queen. Fortunately, my piano teacher was very open to that. She started teaching me harmony and how to play pop songs, and that changed everything. For the first time, I felt like I had access to a musical language that was actually connected to what I loved. Suddenly, I had the tools—the alphabet—to create music that felt real and relevant to me. That was a major turning point. Interestingly, when I later studied composition at the Mozarteum, it felt like a step backward at the time. Looking back now, though, I can see how valuable that education was—especially in the orchestral work I do today. Still, the most important key for me has always been experimentation: learning by doing, exploring, and figuring things out hands-on.

    Latest Work

    Q: What would you like listeners to know about your current musical chapter?

    Thomas: Coming from a background in commercial music and radio jingles, I was trained to think less about my own emotions and more about the emotion of the product. That mindset still influences my work as an artist. But every now and then, I consciously stop and remind myself that this isn’t about what others might feel—it’s about what I feel. When that happens, everything changes. There are moments in the studio when I get emotional—not from sadness, but from a deep sense of happiness and connection. I’m not always sure whether listeners can hear that difference. But I can feel it, and that alone makes this current chapter incredibly meaningful to me.

    Q: Across your recent releases, what emotional or conceptual thread do you keep returning to—and why does it matter to you right now?

    Thomas: Music is always experienced at different points in time—one for the artist and another for the listener. What you hear today represents where I was creatively in the past. Internally, though, I’ve already moved on. Right now, I’m in a phase where I want to redefine my sound—to develop a clear artistic DNA that truly represents me. That direction is already quite far removed from what you can currently hear in my latest releases.

    Creative Approach

    Thomas Foster

    Q: Your background in writing for radio/TV teaches extreme clarity and impact. How does that ‘broadcast mindset’ influence your songwriting, sound design, and arrangement when you create music under your own name?

    Thomas: Client work, personal music, and my YouTube channel are deeply connected. Client work gave me speed and routine. My own music allows me to experiment. And YouTube forces me to learn even more deeply. All three areas constantly feed into each other, and that exchange is what keeps everything evolving.

    Q: Can you describe a moment in a project where everything clicked—or almost fell apart? What decision saved it?

    Thomas: The most important moments often don’t happen in the studio. They happen in everyday life—when suddenly, you know how something should sound. Sometimes I’ve completely finished a project and then had that moment. I threw everything away and started again. That’s the difference between something good and something truly special.

    Personal & Creativity-Related

    Q: Outside the studio, what keeps your creative engine running—places, routines, films, books, conversations, silence, something else?

    Thomas: I don’t struggle to become creative—I struggle to switch it off. Even on vacation, my mind starts working after a short time. Ideas keep coming. It’s driven by something very deep—probably rooted in early recognition and motivation. It can be exhausting, but it’s also what keeps me moving.

    Q: Do you follow a repeatable workflow when you start a track, or do you thrive on spontaneity? What’s one habit that consistently leads to better results for you?

    Thomas: I have two workflows. One is structured: beat, chords, arrangement. The other starts with the core idea—the emotional center. And the second one usually leads to better results.

    Q: How do you deal with creative blocks or self-doubt—especially when you’re under deadlines?

    Thomas: I’m not working alone—we’re a team of three producers. We compete, but we also support each other. That dynamic helps us overcome creative blocks and pushes us toward better results.

    Inspiration & Listening

    Q: What artists, albums, or producers have inspired you recently—and what specific element sparked you?

    Thomas: I had a powerful experience in Ibiza at UNVRS, seeing Eric Prydz perform “Opus.” The combination of music, visuals, and energy created a state that felt almost unreal. It reminded me how powerful music can be.

    Q: If you could recommend one piece of music—any genre—that everyone should hear at least once, what would it be and why?

    Thomas: “Don’t Stop Me Now” by Queen. No other song captures pure energy and positivity in such an explosive way.

    Creative Philosophy & Vision

    Q: Where do experimentation and risk-taking fit into your work today—both in client-driven productions and in your personal releases? What’s a ‘safe risk’ you love taking?

    Thomas: We’ve always believed in doing things differently. Today, technology allows us to take safe risks—to experiment freely while still staying in control.

    Q: If there were no limits—no deadlines, no budget constraints, no technical restrictions—what would your dream project look like?

    Thomas: A creative space near the sea, with artists constantly collaborating. A place where music happens naturally—something between Ibiza and Paisley Park.

    From Silence to Sound – Creative Identity

    Q: I often explore how personal decisions shape a signature sound. Which choices define yours most clearly—your harmonic language, grooves, instrument palette, sound design, mix space, or something else?

    Thomas: Not complexity—emotion. Everything starts with one question: what should the listener feel?

    Q: Looking back, what were the key turning points that changed how you create?

    Thomas: Building Foster Kent with a partner—and starting my YouTube channel. Both changed everything.

    Closing

    Thomas Foster

    Q: What do you hope listeners feel or take away from your music—especially on days when they need calm, energy, or a reset?

    Thomas: I once had a moment in the car with my son, singing along to a song. If I can create something like that for even one person, that’s enough.

    Q: What’s the most valuable advice you’d give to a producer who’s overwhelmed by options and wants to find their own voice faster?

    Thomas: Don’t try to be unique from day one. First, become good within a space that works. Then evolve. Your voice will come naturally.

    Q: Finally, what’s next for you—musically, professionally, and creatively? What should we watch out for in the coming months?

    Thomas: In the early 2000s, I built a live instrument called NYX (N-Y-X)—a transparent touchscreen that allows me to perform electronic music live while facing the audience. You can actually find performances of it on YouTube if you search for “NYX Thomas Foster.” Now I’m rebuilding it from scratch, taking it to a completely new level and integrating modern technology and artificial intelligence. This will become a new artistic project with its own identity and name, alongside my work as Thomas Foster. My goal is to bring it to life by the end of the summer. It truly feels like the beginning of a new chapter.

  • Christoph Sebastian Pabst Interview: Christoph on Place‑Inspired Electronica, Creative Freedom, and Capturing the Now

    Christoph Sebastian Pabst Interview: Christoph on Place‑Inspired Electronica, Creative Freedom, and Capturing the Now

    Christoph Sebastian Pabst creates melodic, place-inspired electronica where deep-house pulse meets ambient air—music that turns landscape, memory, and motion into warm, emotionally direct sound.

    The Interview

    Introduction

    Q: For those who don’t know you yet: how would you describe yourself as an artist in a few sentences—and what kind of emotional space do you want your music to open for listeners?

    Christoph: I see myself as a producer and artist who is fundamentally free and independent. While I try to maintain a certain artistic line, my influences are quite diverse. If you stream my music, you might not always find a single “red thread” because I move between Ambient, Neoclassical, Chillout, Downbeat, and Deep House. But for me, it is always about a feeling, a specific emotion that is present the moment I create. It can range from deep melancholy to pure happiness. Honestly, I don’t even feel like a musician in the traditional sense, as I haven’t mastered any instrument. I wouldn’t belong on a stage, unless it was just to turn a cutoff knob or slide an envelope. I’m a creator of moods.

    Q: Your journey includes phases of growth, a longer pause, and a strong return with a clear identity. What was your path into music like—was there a defining moment when you knew you wanted to create your own worlds through sound?

    Christoph: I fell in love with pianos and keyboards very early on. My sister took lessons on an upright piano at home, and whenever it was free, I would sit down and improvise. I never had formal lessons; to me, sheet music looks like hieroglyphics.

    In the early 90s, the Amiga 500 opened the door to electronic music for me. I was the first in my circle with an 8-bit sampler, playing sounds via the computer keyboard using a 4-track tracker. Eventually, I built a full studio in my basement with legendary gear like the MS-20, Juno 60, and TB-303. But back then, I didn’t truly understand the technical side of production, the sound was often muddy. After a brief stint releasing Disco House on vinyl and later moving away for my medical studies and starting a family, music faded into the background for years.

    The turning point came years later while I was traveling as a locum doctor. I rediscovered my old ideas and felt it was a tragedy to let them be forgotten. I sent them to you, Thomas — we had met years earlier through a classified ad — and that spark led to our first song, Pastellstrand, and to our albums Meerblick and Bergblick. That return to music felt like coming home.

    Latest Work

    Q: How did the Chiemgau region shape “Chiemgaumorgen” and “Traunnebel,” and what do you hope listeners feel when they hear them?

    Christoph: Right now, I’m working on a beautiful new project with…you! That will eventually become an album. It’s inspired by the Chiemgau region where I live. The first songs, Chiemgaumorgen and Traunnebel, are quiet Ambient pieces with a Neoclassical touch. It’s music for wandering through nature, for standing by the lake or in the mountains, and simply marveling at the world. It’s best heard when you want to relax and breathe.

    Q: How would you describe this release in your own words—and where does it sit in your evolution as an artist right now?

    Christoph: I tend to find ideas and inspiring sounds very spontaneously. Because of my medical profession and my family, I often don’t have the time to get lost in the tiny technical details of mixing and mastering. I am incredibly grateful to you Thomas for that. You are a master of clarity and depth. You handle the final polish, the Dolby Atmos versions, and the visual side. This allows me to stay in the pure creative flow of finding that initial spark.

    Q: Your work often feels connected to specific places and moods—Bavarian landscapes, lakes, mornings, islands, wide horizons. What emotional or conceptual thread did you keep returning to while making this new piece?

    Christoph: The Chiemgau is a landscape of contrasts. You have wide plains and gentle hills meeting the jagged edges of the Alps and the vastness of the Lake Chiemsee. I am captivated by the reflections in the still water at sunrise, the mystery of morning fog, and that tension between vastness and limitation. It’s where reality and fantasy meet.

    Creative Approach

    Q: How did you approach the creative process for this project—writing, sound design, arrangement, mixing? Was it different from your earlier releases?

    Christoph: My process is very intimate. I sit at my desk at night with my MacBook, my Genelec speakers, and my master keyboard. I’ll pull up a beautiful felt piano or a synth pad, add some reverb and delay, and then I just close my eyes and play. I visualize the mountains and the water, and usually, a perfect basis for a song emerges surprisingly quickly.

    Q: Can you describe a moment during the creation where everything clicked—or almost fell apart? What changed the outcome in the end?

    Christoph: There are dry spells, of course. Sometimes the sound is right but the melody is wrong. I’ll sleep on it, throw out everything that doesn’t resonate, and start fresh with whatever fragment felt “real.” For this Chiemgau project, focusing on Ambient has been a relief. I’ve always struggled with beats and rhythms — I often have something in my head that I can’t translate to my satisfaction. By letting the beats go, the melodies just flow out of me.

    Personal & Creativity-Related

    Q: Your music often feels like it’s born from place: you translate landscapes into harmony, texture, and rhythm. What does a “real location” become in your studio—chords, tempo, sound palette, silence?

    Christoph: The Chiemgau is soft and warm. The sound of this place, to me, is analog and living, but never harsh. In the studio, this means the filters on my synths are never fully open; the frequencies aren’t too high. The bass has a solid foundation. It’s a slow, evolving sound — not “pure” ambient that just drifts, but something that carries a melody, blurring the lines with Neoclassical and Chillout.

    Q: Your sound balances an emotional warmth with clean electronic production. Do you have a routine, ritual, or habit that helps you stay inspired (certain hours, a walking route, a first sound you always start with)—or do you thrive more on spontaneity?

    Christoph: It’s almost entirely spontaneous. I need a sound that fits the exact moment. When I find a preset that moves me, I start shaping it — swapping a square wave for a sawtooth, playing with the envelope and the stereo image until it feels alive.

    Q: How do you deal with creative blocks, self-doubt, or periods of silence—especially when you’re working with subtle emotions and minimal elements?

    Christoph: If it’s not working, I walk away. I’ll bounce a rough idea and listen to it in the car or at breakfast. Often, the solution comes to me while I’m not at the desk, and I can’t wait to get back to it.

    I’ve also consciously stepped back from social media. I found myself “killing time” by scrolling, and it didn’t feel good. I prefer the “real” silence now. True silence can be haunting at first because it forces you to face yourself, but it’s where the best ideas live.

    Inspiration & Listening

    Q: Which artists or albums have inspired you most recently, and why? (Harmony, groove, sound design, storytelling, restraint—anything that sparked a new idea.)

    Christoph: I don’t actually listen to music around the clock — I need space for conversations and family life. But I am moved by artists like Ólafur Arnalds or Two Lanes. I admire their sense of restraint. For a while, I was fascinated by Dreamscapes — how a simple, expressive melody can feel so complete.

    Q: If you could recommend one piece of music—any genre—that everyone should listen to at least once, what would it be?

    Christoph: That’s hard! I grew up inspired by Vangelis and Jean-Michel Jarre, but I’d probably point toward the classics like Phil Collins, Depeche Mode or Sting. They laid the foundations for everything we do today.

    Creative Philosophy & Vision

    Q: Your music walks a fine line: it can be functional (focus/relax) and still emotionally meaningful. What role do experimentation and risk-taking play in your music—and where do you allow yourself to break your own “rules”?

    Christoph: I don’t really have “rules” to break because I don’t think in terms of theory. I often realize after a song is finished that it isn’t in a 4/4 time signature. My project Toteles was my space for going “all over the place” experimentally, even if it wasn’t a commercial success. It was pure joy.

    Q: If there were no limits—no budget, no deadlines, no technical restrictions—what would your dream creative project look like? (A concept EP tied to places, a long-form album journey, film/series scoring, immersive audio, a live setup, etc.)

    Christoph: I’ve always wanted to score a film. I’ve entered competitions before, and while I didn’t always hit the “jury’s taste,” I know I could create something deeply emotional for a quiet, contemplative movie — drama, science fiction, fantasy, romance or documentary film.

    From Silence to Sound – Creative Identity

    Q: I often explore how personal decisions shape a musician’s signature sound. Which choices do you feel most strongly define your sound—your chord language, your relationship to groove, your instrument palette (felt piano / organic textures), your mix aesthetics, your sense of space?

    Christoph: My sounds have very few overtones; I avoid harsh highs. I prefer felt piano over a grand piano, and I like my chords to have a bit of a “wrong” note in them, something that creates a subtle contrast. I couldn’t tell you the names of the chords, but I know how they feel.

    Q: You also release music under the name TEPON. What made you create a second identity—and what is different there (emotion, tempo, storytelling, sound palette)? How do you decide which idea belongs to Christoph Sebastian Pabst vs. TEPON?

    Christoph: TEPON was an attempt to create a “pure” Ambient identity, partly to escape my struggle with beats. But truthfully, the lines are blurring. The Chiemgau project with you occupies that same soul-space.

    Closing

    Q: What do you hope listeners feel or take away when they experience your music—especially on days when they need calm, clarity, or a reset?

    Christoph: I want them to feel themselves, to notice the nuances of being alive. I want the music to help them connect with the world and feel a deep gratitude for what we have. It’s about making the things that fade in the busyness of everyday life shine again.

    Q: If you could give one piece of advice to someone at the beginning of their creative journey, what would it be?

    Christoph: Just start. You don’t need a Moog or a professional studio. Sit down, experiment, and learn from how you feel while playing. Ask for help, watch tutorials, but most importantly: don’t try to be someone else. You are interesting and valuable exactly as you are. The world is waiting for your unique story, not for more of the same.

    Q: You’ve collaborated in different constellations (duo projects, remixes, joint singles). What do collaborations teach you about your own sound—and how do you keep your personal artistic identity strong inside a shared process?

    Christoph: I learn so much through collaborations. I draw a lot of inspiration from the exchange with another artist, it always brings forth something entirely different than if I had created the music alone in isolation. It develops this genuine sense of “we,” a true togetherness. Of course, it’s all part of the journey: sharing the joy of a breakthrough, and sometimes perhaps being briefly irritated by an influence that doesn’t quite seem to fit at first. But it is exactly this exchange that fulfills me. You share the music with someone long before the world outside hears it. I enjoy that very much, and I’m always thrilled whenever I find new input from you or suddenly discover an idea or a finished song in my inbox to check out. It makes the entire process come alive.

    Q: Finally, what’s next for you—what should we be looking forward to?

    Christoph: More singles with you Thomas, leading up to an album! But to be honest, we don’t have a name for it yet. I think we should keep it simple and pure. How about just Chiemgau, or perhaps Chiemo, the namesake of the region? Whatever we decide, it’s going to be something very special. I’m just so happy to be on this journey with you again!

  • MALIWA Interview: MALIWA on Guitar-Driven Lo-Fi, Jazzy Chillhop, and Creative Consistency

    MALIWA Interview: MALIWA on Guitar-Driven Lo-Fi, Jazzy Chillhop, and Creative Consistency

    MALIWA crafts chilled, jazz-infused lo-fi that feels like a small daily reset—warm chords, soft groove, and a guitar-minded sense of touch that turns simple moments into atmosphere.

    MALIWA

    The Interview

    Introduction

    Q: For those who don’t know you yet: how would you describe yourself as an artist in a few sentences—and what does the name MALIWA stand for in your musical world?

    MALIWA: MALIWA is one of my music projects, which I started in 2022. I have a lot of different musical tastes, but everything I make in the lo-fi, jazzy beats, and chillhop world flows into this project.

    Q: You’re extremely consistent and prolific—your discography is huge. Looking back: what was your journey into lo-fi, and was there a defining moment when you knew this “chilled + jazzy” direction was your lane?

    MALIWA: A few years ago, one of my guitar students wanted to learn a song by L’indécis. I loved it and fell down the rabbit hole—after the lesson, I listened through his entire discography. I was so hooked that I tried composing something in that direction myself, and the ideas kept coming. I stuck with it and went deeper and deeper into the genre.

    Latest Work

    Q: Your releases often feel like snapshots—compact, direct, and mood-first. Where do you feel your sound is right now compared to earlier MALIWA tracks, and what are you consciously refining?

    MALIWA: I hope my sound has improved over the years. I’m trying to get faster and more confident with recording and producing—and especially with capturing the mood I hear in my head. Starting MALIWA was when I really began to dive deep into production.

    Q: There’s a clear atmosphere running through your catalog—cozy, relaxed, jazzy, and emotionally “light on its feet.” What emotional or conceptual thread do you keep returning to when you write?

    MALIWA: I don’t chase a specific concept—I let inspiration lead the way. Luckily, I almost always have ideas when I sit down at my instruments. Fingers crossed it stays that way.

    Creative Approach

    Q: When a new track starts, what usually comes first for you: a chord progression, a drum pocket, a sample/texture, a guitar phrase, or a specific emotion?

    MALIWA: I don’t have a fixed process—every track starts differently. I can be inspired by almost anything: a chord, a little lick, a drum groove, a new sound, or a mood. Whatever shows up first becomes the starting point, and from there, I build the track.

    Personal & Creativity-Related

    MALIWA

    Q: You share a lot of your world through Instagram. How do visuals and short-form content shape your creative process—does social media inspire you, pressure you, or help you stay connected?

    MALIWA: For me, social media is at its best when it does what it was meant to do: connect you with inspiring people around the world. It’s how I’ve found almost all of my collaborators, and I love discovering new ideas through other artists’ channels. But if I’m being honest, it can get overwhelming fast—and I still catch myself spending way more time on it than I should.

    Q: Do you have a routine or ritual that helps you stay productive—or do you thrive more on spontaneity?

    MALIWA: I don’t really have a routine. But I usually have works-in-progress with other people, so I’m always motivated to move things forward. I want each track to be as good as I can make it—that’s what drives me.

    Q: How do you deal with creative blocks, self-doubt, or periods of silence—especially when you’ve built a project that’s known for regular releases?

    MALIWA: I allow it. It’s rare for me to have no ideas—usually, as soon as I focus, I start creating. But I don’t panic anymore if nothing shows up for a while. I keep learning, let myself be inspired, and it comes back. Luckily, that’s always been the case for me.

    Inspiration & Listening

    Q: Which artists or albums have inspired you most recently—and what did they unlock in you creatively (jazz harmony, drum swing, sound design, texture, arrangement, mix choices)?

    MALIWA: I’ve been listening to a lot of Kenny Burrell lately—an American jazz guitarist with incredible flow and versatility. I’d love to absorb even a small piece of that and bring it into my own playing. And I’ve been a big fan of Tom Misch for years—a superb songwriter, producer, and all-round talent.

    Q: If you could recommend one piece of music—any genre—that everyone should listen to at least once, what would it be (and why that one)?

    MALIWA: Then maybe a L’indécis track. I’m not sure everyone needs to hear it, but it started this whole journey for me—and it’s still super groovy and tasteful: “L’indécis – Soulful.”

    Creative Philosophy & Vision

    Q: In lo-fi, the line between “beautiful” and “generic” can be thin. What role do experimentation and risk-taking play in your music—and what do you do to keep your sound fresh while staying MALIWA recognizably?

    MALIWA: Experimentation is very important to me—I could do it all day. I’m open to all kinds of music and influences, and I’m always trying new things and creating unpredictable moments. I make music with whatever I can get my hands on. I’m not sure I have a clearly recognizable style yet, but exploring is the best way I know to develop one.

    Q: If there were no limits—no budget, no deadlines, no technical restrictions—what would your dream creative project look like?

    MALIWA: I’d love to write an album with Tom Misch and L’indécis—and then tour it with them.

    From Silence to Sound – Creative Identity

    MALIWA
    MALIWA

    Q: I often explore how personal decisions shape a musician’s signature sound. Which choices most strongly define your sound—chord language, groove, drum texture, instrument palette, the way you treat “imperfection,” your mix aesthetics?

    MALIWA: I don’t have a specific strategy for that, but you’ll probably always hear my guitars in my songs.

    Q: Looking back, what have been the most important turning points in your creative journey—moments that changed how you make music or how you think about release strategy, collaboration, and consistency?

    MALIWA: Learning to record myself, learning to produce, and staying open to collaborations.

    Closing

    Q: What do you hope listeners feel or take away when they experience your music—especially on days when they need calm, focus, or a reset?

    MALIWA: I hope listeners can unwind and nod their heads to my music.

    Q: If you could give one piece of advice to someone at the beginning of their creative journey (especially someone navigating doubt or a “silent phase”), what would it be?

    MALIWA: Be open-minded. Try out everything you can musically. It doesn’t matter if anyone else likes it, as long as you like it. Start songs and finish them. Keep going. Keep learning. Immerse yourself in the craft and dive in headfirst. Love what you do.

    Q: Finally, what’s next for you—what should we be looking forward to?

    MALIWA: I’m constantly working on new songs with people scattered all over the globe. I really enjoy this varied and creative process. I hope I can meet more of my collaborators in real life, not just online.

  • Sinatic Interview: Sinatic on Emotion-First Songwriting, Hook Craft, and Cinematic Pop

    Sinatic Interview: Sinatic on Emotion-First Songwriting, Hook Craft, and Cinematic Pop

    Sinatic is an exceptional songwriter—hook-smart, emotionally precise, and deeply musical—who pairs pop-level craft with cinematic electronic production. Just as impressive is his collaborator mindset: he’s worked with singers around the globe with a rare mix of empathy and clarity, and his guitar playing adds a warm, human signature that cuts straight through the electronics.

    Sinatic

    The Interview

    Introduction

    Q: For those who don’t know you yet: how would you describe yourself as an artist in a few sentences—and what does the name Sinatic stand for in your musical world?

    Sinatic: I describe myself as an artist who prioritizes emotion as the primary driver and technique as its servant. To me, music is a translation of the intangible into the audible; every tone carries a specific impulse that the listener receives as a feeling. Because of this, quality is non-negotiable. I believe even the most microscopic sonic detail can pivot the emotional weight of a song. My work exists in the fertile ground between cinematic soundscapes, electronic textures, and melodic pop, creating expansive musical spaces that invite the listener to step in and connect on a deeper level.

    The name Sinatic is the heartbeat of this philosophy. When I established the project in 1998, I sought a name that felt both mysterious and timeless – something that carried the evocative spirit of projects like Enigma. I discovered the term “Sinatic” in an essay on ancient languages, and it resonated instantly. It carries the weight of a learned, classical term; its roots evoke the “Sinaitic” – a sense of origin and revelation – while its suffix suggests a fundamental state or principle. Intuitively, the word represents music as a primal source, a language that exists before words. For me, Sinatic is a creative identity dedicated to authenticity, depth, and a connection to something fundamental and timeless.

    Q: You began in chillout and later moved through pop and more song-driven work—then returned to your roots with two decades of experience behind you. Looking back: what were the key turning points that shaped your identity as producer + songwriter?

    Sinatic: Looking back, the biggest turning point was leaving my comfort zone. I grew up in the 1980s, and at some point, I discovered the music of Vangelis, Jean-Michel Jarre, and Mike Oldfield. Their melodic worlds had a huge impact on me. The atmosphere, the emotion, and especially the sound of synthesizers fascinated me from the very beginning. That was probably the moment when I first realized how powerful sound can be in creating feelings and images beyond words, and it shaped my musical instincts long before I started producing myself.

    I started in chillout music, where atmosphere and emotion were always at the center, but over time, I became curious about songwriting and the craft behind songs that truly stay with people. Moving into pop and more song-driven production forced me to think differently. Suddenly, it was not only about sound and mood, but also about structure, storytelling, and creating moments listeners remember.

    Another important turning point was working behind the scenes with different producers and artists. Being part of collaborative environments taught me how much discipline and intention lie behind great music. I learned that a strong song is rarely accidental. It is the result of countless small decisions, from melody choices to sound design and arrangement. That experience shaped my identity as both a producer and songwriter, because I began to see production and songwriting as one unified process rather than two separate roles.

    Returning to my chillout roots later felt almost like coming full circle, but with a completely new perspective. After two decades, I approached atmospheric music differently. I brought songwriting sensibility, emotional storytelling, and technical precision back into a genre that originally inspired me. For me, one of the most important lessons along the way was that music only truly connects when you genuinely feel it yourself. Authenticity is essential. If the emotion is real during the creation process, listeners will recognize it, and that honesty ultimately defines my identity as an artist today.

    Latest Work

    Q: Please introduce your latest release in your own words. What is it, and how would you like listeners to approach it—headphones, late-night listening, a drive, background focus, or a deep “front-to-back” listen?

    Sinatic: My latest release, Almost Yours, captures a very special energy that has always lived somewhere inside my musical DNA. It is deeply inspired by the emotional atmosphere of the 1980s, a time when melodies felt cinematic and nostalgic at once, but translated into a modern production language. I wanted to combine that timeless synth-driven feeling with contemporary sound design, so it feels familiar and new at once.

    The track carries a lot of energy, but it also has a bittersweet undertone that has become something like a signature element in my music. I’m always drawn to that emotional space between hope and nostalgia, where a song feels both uplifting and melancholic at once. Almost Yours lives exactly in that tension.

    The song is also a first glimpse into my upcoming album Pop Evolutions, which will be released later this year. As one of the singles from the project, it captures the album’s direction very well, blending emotional songwriting with modern pop production while retaining subtle retro influences.

    Ideally, I would love listeners to experience it with headphones or during a late-night drive, when music feels more personal and immersive. It works as an energetic track, but it really reveals its emotional layers when you give it your full attention. For me, it’s not just background music. It’s meant to create a mood, a moment, and maybe even a memory while you listen.

    Q: How would you describe this release (album/EP/single) in your own words—and where does it sit in your evolution as an artist right now?

    Sinatic: I would describe Almost Yours as a bridge between my musical roots and where I am creatively today. It combines my early love for atmospheric electronic music with everything I’ve learned through years of pop songwriting and production. For me, it feels like a very honest snapshot of my current artistic identity.

    At this point in my evolution, production and songwriting are no longer separate processes. Sound, melody, and emotion all grow from the same idea, which makes the music feel more focused and authentic. Rather than chasing trends, I’m embracing the influences that shaped me and translating them into a modern sound.

    As part of the upcoming album Pop Evolutions, the release marks a phase of clarity and confidence for me as an artist, creating music that feels emotionally real and, hopefully, timeless.

    Q: There’s a cinematic warmth and forward motion in your recent work. What emotional or conceptual thread did you keep returning to while making it?

    Sinatic: The emotional thread I kept returning to was the idea of movement, both emotionally and personally. Many of the songs were created around the feeling of being in transition, standing between nostalgia and forward motion. I’m very drawn to that space where something feels familiar and comforting, but at the same time pushes you toward something new. That naturally created this cinematic warmth, because cinematic music often carries a sense of journey and emotional progression.

    Another important concept was emotional honesty. I always try to create music that I genuinely feel while making it, because listeners can sense whether an emotion is real or constructed. Every sound choice, every melody, was guided by the question: does this create a feeling, does it move something inside? For me, music works best when it doesn’t just exist as sound, but as an emotional experience unfolding over time.

    So the common thread throughout the process was balancing energy and vulnerability. I wanted the music to move forward rhythmically and sonically, while still leaving space for reflection and emotion. That contrast became a defining element of this phase of my work.

    Songwriting, Hooks, Guitar & Craft

    Sinatic

    Q: You’re an exceptional songwriter—hook-smart, emotionally precise, and deeply musical. When you write, what does “great songwriting” mean to you in practice (tension/release, chorus lift, lyric economy, melodic architecture, arrangement pacing)?

    Sinatic: Great songwriting starts with a simple truth: if it doesn’t feel real, it won’t work. While I utilize the technical architecture of music (tension, release, and pacing), these are always secondary to authenticity. I aim for lyrical clarity, choosing words whose “sound” complements their “sense” to let the melody breathe.

    I view hooks through two lenses: in pop, they must be instantly iconic; in cinematic music, they act as a guide through more complex, atmospheric landscapes. Whether I’m writing a radio hit or a film score, my goal remains the same: to serve the emotion of the piece. By balancing technical precision with human feeling, I strive to create music that feels honest from the first note to the last.

    Q: You’ve studied a “Max Martin approach” to hit-making. What parts of that mindset genuinely improved your craft—and what parts did you choose to ignore to stay authentic?

    Sinatic: Studying the Max Martin approach provided me with a masterclass in the “architecture” of a hit. His methodology, which famously draws from the melodic DNA of ABBA, taught me how to use tension and release, refine arrangement pacing, and ensure that every hook lands with maximum impact. I’ve taken a deep dive into that signature “Wall of Sound,” analyzing how layering and sonic density can create an overwhelming emotional response. That discipline, focusing on how a song guides a listener from the first beat to the last, has sharpened my technical toolkit and given me the precision to write music that truly sticks.

    However, I’ve learned that these “rules” only hold power when they are fueled by authentic feeling. While I embrace the structural framework of the greats, I consciously discard anything that feels like a formula without a soul. My process always returns to simplicity and emotional honesty. I allow my intuition to guide the melody – even when it bends conventional expectations – and I prioritize lyrics that feel lived-in and natural. For me, the Max Martin and ABBA influence is a powerful foundation, but the true magic only happens when that technical “Wall of Sound” meets a genuine human connection.

    Ultimately, I want the listener to have a clear, guided path as they immerse themselves in my sonic world. Too much distraction creates restlessness. My goal is to remove the noise so the listener can truly settle into the heart of the song.

    Q: When you write a topline or hook, how do you judge if it’s truly sticky and emotionally honest—what’s your test?

    Sinatic: When I’m crafting a topline or a hook, intuition is my primary compass. I pay close attention to what lingers: the melodies that refuse to leave my head after the first listen. My process often involves creating four or five distinct variations of a hook, then stepping away to let the dust settle. Returning with fresh ears allows me to decide based purely on emotional resonance rather than the technical effort of the moment.

    Sometimes, the most compelling ideas emerge from the most unexpected places. I frequently revisit song concepts from years ago; occasionally, a piece of a puzzle finally clicks in a way I couldn’t have forced back then. For me, that authentic connection is non-negotiable. If I don’t truly identify with the music, the project is moved to what I jokingly call the “graveyard of ideas.” Over the years, this archive has grown into thousands of unfinished concepts – a testament to my commitment to quality. For me, this vetting process is essential: only the hooks and toplines that genuinely move me are worthy of being brought to life and shared with the world.

    Q: Your guitar playing is a real signature. How does guitar show up in your process—do you start with guitar sketches, use it to find harmony, or add it later as an emotional layer?

    Sinatic: Guitar has always been a cornerstone of my sonic identity; a passion rooted in my early discovery of Mike Oldfield’s melodic sensibilities. While the era of the sprawling guitar solo has largely faded from “mainstream pop”, I’ve found subtle, modern ways to weave the instrument into almost every track I produce. My process often begins with a guitar sampler to capture the initial spark of a progression or a melodic line. However, the real magic happens during the final recording, where the physicality and expression of the strings bring a human nuance that a synth or piano simply cannot replicate.

    Looking back at my body of work, guitars are everywhere, though not always in the way you’d expect. They live in the psychoacoustic layers, as “ear candy,” or as organic textures that breathe life into a mix. Whether it’s a deliberate riff or a shimmering atmospheric wash, the guitar adds a layer of organic movement to even my most electronic-heavy productions. For me, the guitar isn’t just an instrument; it’s a direct conduit for emotion, bridging the gap between high-end production and the undeniable warmth of the human touch.

    Creative Approach

    Sinatic

    Q: When a track starts for you, what usually comes first: the groove, a chord progression, a lyric phrase, a vocal melody, or a sound/texture?

    Sinatic: My creative process is fluid; there is no single starting point. Often, I begin with what I call “quick song starters” – opening a blank session and diving into the vast, vocal-like textures of plugins like Omnisphere or Kontakt. These sounds often feel less like software and more like living voices. I’ll improvise with a specific patch, letting the emotional weight of the chords dictate the direction rather than following rigid theory. Usually, as the progression takes shape, lead lines and vocal melodies begin to materialize in my mind almost instantly.

    In other moments, a specific groove or a raw sonic texture might be the spark that ignites the entire arrangement. I view this stage much like EQing: while there are technical principles you can follow, there is no absolute “right” or “wrong.” The only metric that matters is whether the elements coalesce into a world the listener can inhabit. For me, songwriting is a flexible, intuitive dialogue between sound and soul, always guided by what feels right in the moment.

    Q: Can you describe a moment during the creation of a recent release where everything clicked—or almost fell apart? What changed the outcome in the end?

    Sinatic: For me, the most critical element of creation is sustaining the flow. If that intuitive connection breaks, I’ve learned to let the idea go rather than try to force a spark that isn’t there. I aim to ride that initial wave of inspiration as far as it will naturally take me, pushing the boundaries of the concept while the energy is still raw.

    Sometimes, everything clicks with startling speed. During the sessions for my Infinity album, for example, three tracks materialized almost in a single day – evolving from a blank slate to a complete rough draft in a matter of hours. Those are the moments where technique, emotion, and timing align perfectly. Conversely, other ideas from those same sessions were “trashed” because they simply didn’t resonate.

    In the end, my intuition is the final judge. If a track feels alive and honest, it moves forward; if not, I have the discipline to step away. By trusting my feelings rather than the urge to force completion, I ensure the music remains authentic. Only the songs that truly survive this vetting process possess the power to connect with the listener.

    Collaboration

    Q: You’re also known as a great collaborator—you’ve worked with singers around the globe, and your productions often feel tailored to the voice. What do collaborations teach you about your own sound—and how do you keep your identity strong inside a shared process?

    Sinatic: Collaborations are a fascinating collision of two creative worlds, often yielding results neither artist could achieve alone. To me, the “human / soul energy” between collaborators is the secret ingredient of any great song; that chemistry is what breathes life into a project.

    When working with other songwriters, I often begin as a quiet observer. I study their unique approach to melody, lyricism, and arrangement—treating their process as a distinct form of “sound painting.” This allows me to see where our techniques might merge, refine, or even challenge one another. It’s a constant evolution; I’m always looking for ways to adapt and elevate my own craft through these shared experiences.

    However, I am mindful that my own identity must remain a clear thread in the tapestry. I ensure there is a recognizable Sinatic fingerprint in every collaboration – whether through my specific harmonic choices, atmospheric textures, or emotional phrasing. For me, the art of collaboration is a delicate balance: honoring the creative world of another while staying anchored in the authenticity of my own.

    Sinatic
    Sinatic

    Q: When a collaboration works, what’s the real reason—chemistry, clarity of roles, a shared reference world, speed, trust, or something else?

    Sinatic: When a collaboration truly succeeds, it is rooted in resonance. Everyone involved must be “in tune” with the song’s ultimate purpose, allowing the music itself to dictate the direction. At this level, the ego must take a back seat. We all bring a unique set of strengths and weaknesses to the table, and the most rewarding sessions happen when we use our skills to support one another, filling the gaps and elevating the collective vision rather than competing for space.

    While factors like chemistry, technical speed, and shared reference points are essential, they are secondary to trust and selfless alignment. Without that fundamental resonance, even the most skilled team can struggle to find the heart of a track. For me, that moment of alignment – where personal agendas fade, and the music takes over – is what transforms a standard session into something truly special.

    Working with Thomas Lemmer – Building a Concept World

    Q: You’re currently creating a collaborative concept album with Thomas Lemmer (Infinity). What was the initial spark—why did this partnership make sense artistically?

    Sinatic: The initial spark for Infinity was born from a long-standing resonance with Thomas Lemmer’s sonic architecture. Having admired the atmospheric depth of his work for years, the moment came when the timing finally aligned, and it felt inevitable to merge our creative worlds into a collaborative concept album.

    The results were a revelation. The synergy between our styles unlocked creative avenues I hadn’t anticipated, resulting in compositions that feel entirely unique to this partnership. To further elevate this cinematic experience, the album was mixed in immersive Dolby Atmos, a move that fundamentally enhances the spatial depth and allows the listener to step directly into the soundscape. For me, this project was the ultimate validation of my collaborative philosophy: two artists pushing past their individual boundaries to create a rich, expansive world that neither could have built alone.

    Q: Compared to pop/dance writing, concept-driven chillout demands a different kind of patience and storytelling. What did you have to unlearn—and what did you bring from the pop world that actually helped?

    Sinatic: Concept-driven chillout demands a unique level of patience and surgical attention to detail. Unlike the immediate gratification of pop or dance music, the production process here is far more rigorous – sonic layers are built with meticulous precision, and automation is used to breathe life into every corner of the mix. In this world, strict quantization takes a back seat; preserving the “human touch” is paramount. I focus intensely on the negative space – how a song breathes and how the dynamics shift – to ensure every detail meets a “top-shelf” standard of quality.

    Paradoxically, my background in pop and dance has become my greatest asset in this expansive genre. By applying my understanding of structure, hook placement, and emotional pacing, I can guide the listener through atmospheric landscapes without losing their attention. I’ve had to “unlearn” the shortcuts of radio-ready production, yet I’ve retained the clarity, focus, and melodic intuition that make music truly compelling. The result is a sound that is deeply immersive and cinematic yet remains fundamentally approachable.

    Creative Identity & Closing

    Sinatic

    Q: I often explore how personal decisions shape a musician’s signature sound. Which choices most strongly define your sound—your chord language, hook instincts, sound design, guitar touch, mix aesthetics, or your sense of emotion?

    Sinatic: Ultimately, my signature sound is a mosaic of deliberate choices rather than a single element. It is born at the intersection of my specific chord language and my instincts for hooks, which together shape the song’s emotional arc. I view sound design and mix aesthetics as the architecture of the track – defining its texture and space – while my guitar touch acts as the organic pulse, providing the subtle melodic and rhythmic cues that ground the production in reality.

    Above all, emotion is the connective tissue. Every decision – from a complex harmonic shift to the most microscopic sonic detail – is filtered through a single question: How does this feel? This unwavering focus on emotional intent, fused with technical precision, is what gives my music its recognizable voice. In an industry often driven by shifting trends, I choose to stay anchored in my own creative intuition. My sound is less about adhering to a genre and more about the thousands of personal decisions I make at every stage of the journey.

    Q: What do you hope listeners feel or take away when they experience your music—whether it’s a chillout journey or a song built for impact?

    Sinatic: Ultimately, my greatest ambition is for my music to act as a catalyst for genuine emotional connection. Whether it is a sprawling chillout journey or a high-energy, hook-driven track, I want the listener to feel something profound – be it a sense of nostalgia, a spark of hope, or a quiet moment of reflection.

    I strive to create music that resonates far beneath the surface, where every texture and melody is a deliberate contribution to a larger experience. To me, success isn’t measured in plays or charts, but in those moments when a listener closes their eyes and truly gets lost in the music. If a feeling lingers long after the final note has faded, then the song has done its job. In the world of Sinatic, emotion always leads the way; everything else is there to support the heart of the song.

    Q: If you could give one piece of advice to someone at the beginning of their creative journey, what would it be?

    Sinatic: If I could offer one piece of advice to those beginning their creative journey, it would be this: embrace patience and become a student of the craft. Immerse yourself in the work, listen with a wide lens, and explore the vast spectrum of musical styles – but through it all, remain anchored in your own truth. Authenticity is your only true currency.

    In an age of constant noise, do not let distractions dilute your focus. True creative growth requires the discipline to stay the course and the courage to protect your vision. If you remain dedicated and honest to your artistic core, the results won’t just follow – they will resonate.

    Q: Finally, what’s next for you—what should we be looking forward to?

    Sinatic: Looking ahead, my focus remains on creating music that moves me first, in the hope that it will do the same for the listener. I am currently diving deeper into the world of cinematic scoring, exploring the vast possibilities of film music. Several sketches are already underway as I experiment with a broader palette – perhaps even a project in the grand, evocative vein of Hans Zimmer.

    While I am embracing this new variety beyond pop and dance, I remain deeply rooted in the ambient and chillout spaces that have always inspired me. For me, the next chapter is about following that same intuitive compass: exploring uncharted sonic territories while ensuring every note remains honest, expansive, and emotionally engaging.

  • C37 Interview: C37 on Into Thin Air, Diary-Like Storytelling, and Emotional Honesty

    C37 Interview: C37 on Into Thin Air, Diary-Like Storytelling, and Emotional Honesty

    C37 (Paul Cudby) turns diary-like memories into emotional downbeat—felt piano, guitar, and delicate electronics shaped by the Lake District—and Into Thin Air captures the beauty and ache of people who touch our lives and then disappear.

    C37
    C37

    The Interview

    Introduction

    Q: For those who don’t know you yet: how would you describe yourself as an artist today—and what does the name C37 represent for you?

    C37: There’s an old stone bridge near my hometown called Cuckoo Arch. I once had a band named after it, before I moved further into the Lake District. The band included my childhood friend and my younger brother, and it was a deeply personal experience. I kept all the recordings but never released them. I still draw on those times and sounds when I make music as C37. The “C” comes from Cuckoo, and “37” was my parents’ house number—where all the recording took place. Maybe one day I’ll release those recordings.

    Q: Your journey includes heavy rock in the 1990s (including touring and a record deal), later shifting toward more textured influences—and eventually electronic music as your main storytelling medium. What were the key turning points that brought you from that world to the C37 sound?

    C37: We’d play thrash metal by day and Pink Floyd by night. We were exposed to all kinds of music. Being close to Manchester obviously meant The Smiths, The Stone Roses, Joy Division, and a thriving rave scene—then bands like Happy Mondays started blending the two worlds. But the real turning point was when I moved out of my marital home. A young person I worked with (in care) played me a track they loved: “Aurol Therapy” by fwrd/slash. That was the moment I realised electronic music could have a real emotional impact. I’m very thankful for that moment.

    Latest Work

    Q: Please introduce Into Thin Air in your own words. What kind of album is it for you—and how would you like listeners to approach it?

    C37: Into Thin Air reflects a twelve-month period of intensely mixed feelings. Each song is directly linked to a moment or feeling from that time. I was going to call it “Foxglove” after the beautiful flower here—which is poisonous. Beauty can hide a great deal of hurt. Listening to it now takes me back to each moment, but not as intensely as during the creation of the tracks. If anyone connects with any of those moments—the sadness or the more hopeful parts—then I’ve done what I set out to do.

    Q: This is your second album, following Beautiful Beginnings. In what ways does Into Thin Air deepen or expand what you started with your debut?

    C37: Into Thin Air was definitely a big step in evolving the sound and style I want C37 to be. Beautiful Beginnings was more raw—made during a time when my personal life felt overwhelming.

    Q: You said this album tries to capture how people enter our lives, impact us emotionally, and then vanish “into thin air.” What moments or emotions were you trying to hold onto most while writing these tracks—love, loss, hope, something else?

    C37: Mainly loss, dotted with moments of hope. C37 was born out of the ashes of a 20-year marriage and raising four children, ending in divorce. However, C37 doesn’t document that time directly; it captures the attempt to rebuild your life, navigate new relationships, and find a sense of peace.

    Creative Approach

    C37
    C37

    Q: The album opens with “Head Space,” weaving in sounds from real life and nature—almost like painting with sound—before the felt piano and guitar pull us into your inner world. Why did you choose that as the opening door into the album?

    C37: I still love the music and atmosphere of this track, and I’m proud I was able to capture that particular week in sound. The field recording underneath it was given to me by the person the track is for. It simply felt like the right way to set the tone for what follows across the album.

    Q: Your music blends emotive piano progressions, layered guitars, ethereal samples, and a hypnotic pulse. When you’re building a track, what usually comes first for you—the chords, a texture, a beat, a melody, or a feeling?

    C37: Nine times out of ten, it’s the feeling that pushes me to start exploring chord progressions. If the chords don’t match the feeling—or I can’t quite achieve it—or, more importantly, it starts to require too much thinking, I stop. When it’s spontaneous—driven by emotion, and it just happens—I know it’s right for C37.

    Personal & Creativity

    Q: You’ve described early C37 releases as almost like diary entries set to music. Does that still feel true on Into Thin Air—and how do you decide what stays private versus what becomes a song?

    C37: Yes—this is still the whole purpose of C37. It’s my diary. So when an album is compiled, you’re getting a dozen “pages” torn out and given away. Of course, some things stay private, but I remain grateful to the person who inspired most of it—even if that time brought huge spikes of sadness and joy for both of us. Without that period, I would never have come to rely on music again. Silver linings.

    Q: The Lake District seems deeply connected to your work—you even visit specific beauty spots to spark ideas. Can you describe how a place becomes a sound in your mind? (Is it harmony, rhythm, ambience, tempo, silence?)

    C37: I live a few minutes from a staggeringly beautiful estuary, with the South Lakeland fells as its backdrop. This place features in nearly all the social media clips I post. There are lots of memories attached to the area, so blending those thoughts with the ambience of the place at sunset is inspirational. Translating that into sound is generally achieved by softening high frequencies and using underlying white noise—or something similar.

    Q: When self-doubt or creative silence shows up, what helps you move through it—especially when you’re working with such emotional themes?

    C37: I create such a large amount of music that I usually have an idea to expand on. However, if a project doesn’t capture the moment I intended, I quickly let it go. If that situation goes on for days, I have a habit of putting myself—mentally—back into historical moments of sadness. I’m aware that isn’t great for overall well-being.

    Inspiration & Listening

    Q: Your influences range widely—from bands like Pink Floyd, The Smiths, and The Stone Roses to electronic impressions from rave culture, and even modern electronica. Which influences feel most present in your current writing—and how do they show up in the details?

    C37: I don’t tend to listen to a great deal of electronic music, but I do have a few favourites I return to. Recently, “After the Rain” by Klur has been my most-played track. I still enjoy earlier Motorpsycho albums and find a lot of inspiration in their work. I’ve always gravitated toward the moodier stuff—so when I listen to Pink Floyd, I’m drawn to the darker moments from The Wall, or anything Roger Waters led.

    Q: If you could recommend one piece of music—any genre—that everyone should listen to at least once, what would it be (and why that one)?

    C37: “Hope in Balance” (Jody Wisternoff and James Grant Remix). It’s an incredible example of electronic music that feels organic and genuinely from the heart.

    Creative Philosophy & Vision

    C37
    C37

    Q: You describe the C37 sound as “written from the heart and never forced.” In practice, how do you know when something is honest—and when you’re trying too hard?

    C37: I never push creativity. If I feel like I’m having to try, I tend to stop. Once an honest feeling is captured, I finish the project.

    Q: If there were no limits—no budget, deadlines, or technical restrictions—what would your dream project be right now?

    C37: It’s been a long time since I played on stages. It would be amazing to see C37 paired with misty Lake District images. Dream-wise, I’d have friends from my earlier bands play C37 live. It may just stay a dream, though.

    From Silence to Sound – Creative Identity

    Q: I often explore how personal decisions shape a musician’s signature sound. Which choices most define your sound—your piano tone, guitar layering, the way you treat ambience, your relationship to rhythm, or the emotional themes you write about?

    C37: It’s the emotional themes that drive the sounds. I can spend a long time searching for—or creating—the right sound to match the theme. The guitar usually comes at the very end of my process, where I’ll just jam over the track to see if anything happens.

    Q: The singles “Last Day of August,” “Are You Home,” and “Close To Losing Everything” previewed the album. What do these titles reveal about the emotional landscape you’re exploring—and why were these the right tracks to introduce the record?

    C37: I suppose they were the liveliest tracks on the album, so they don’t tell the full story. But they do give a good representation of the overall feel and sound.

    Closing

    Q: Finally: what’s next for you after Into Thin Air—do you feel pulled toward going even deeper into emotional downbeat, bringing in more acoustic elements, exploring vocals/lyrics more, or opening a completely new chapter?

    C37: My new album, “The Reality Is…”, continues the search for the definitive C37 sound. There’s less guitar and more soft piano tone on it. It follows a similar pattern, structure, and emotional theme as Into Thin Air.

  • SINE Interview: SINE on Impuls, Meditative Flow, and the Beauty of Rough Edges

    SINE Interview: SINE on Impuls, Meditative Flow, and the Beauty of Rough Edges

    SINE creates expansive, instrument-rich ambient that feels meditative yet alive—and Impuls captures a bold new way of working: fast, intuitive, and guided entirely by the moment.

    SINE
    SINE

    The Interview

    Introduction

    Q: For those who don’t know you yet: how would you describe yourself as an artist today—and what does the name SINE stand for in your musical world?

    SINE: I see myself as a traveler within the world of ambient and downtempo — always curious to explore new directions and gently step beyond familiar boundaries.
    My music is meant to touch listeners on an emotional level and invite them into a quiet inner journey.
    A few moments of stillness.
    Time to be fully present with themselves and the sound.
    A soft pause where the outside world fades, and drifting becomes possible.

    To me, SINE also represents everything beautiful and positive in this world.
    Inspired by the sine wave — the pure building block of all sound — it feels calm, warm, and soothing, yet always in motion and quietly evolving.

    Q: Your musical path started early (accordion lessons, later keyboard, then self-taught guitar), and you’ve played in bands across different genres before building your own soundscapes in the studio. Looking back, was there a defining moment where you felt, “This is the direction I want to go”?

    SINE: I would say this direction has always been within me, quietly present from the very beginning.
    Whether in the past, playing in grunge or metal bands, or later in the world of synth pop, there were always these calm passages — the silent, gentle moments inside the songs.
    Very often, those became my favorite parts.

    Maybe it was only a matter of time until I found a project where I could fully express myself in this kind of sound.

    Latest Work

    Q: Please introduce Impuls in your own words. What kind of album is it for you—and how would you like listeners to approach it (deep headphone listen, morning routine, background focus, late-night reflection, etc.)?

    SINE: As the album title already suggests, Impuls was born exactly from that feeling.
    I woke up in the morning with the idea of following my impulse each day — allowing a new piece of music to emerge before noon.
    Created purely from the moment.
    Without overthinking, without getting lost in details, simply moving straight to the essence until a track had taken shape by the end of the morning.
    In this way, seven songs were finished within a single week.

    I would describe the album as deeply cinematic.
    Many pieces begin in stillness and gradually unfold, gently rising toward a quiet finale.
    I consciously let go of genre expectations or the idea of doing things a certain way just to reach as many playlists as possible.
    It was simply me in that moment, perhaps also my most experimental album so far.

    Where or how people listen to it doesn’t really matter to me.
    What matters is that the music moves someone in some way.

    Q: Impuls includes eight new tracks plus the previously released “Signs of Light,” “Dreamland,” and “Mirror.” How do these pieces belong together—and what story (or arc) do they form as one album?

    SINE: Well, these three pieces were born from the very same feeling as the rest of the album — created deeply from impulse.

    Q: The title Impuls suggests movement and immediacy. What emotional or conceptual thread did you keep returning to while making this record?

    SINE: Trusting your own feeling, your inner flow, and the impulses within you.
    No rules, no pressure — just the freedom to create openly and honestly.

    Creative Approach

    SINE
    SINE

    Q: This album began as a creative challenge: developing a new song idea every day for a week—resulting in eight demos in ten days. What did this constraint unlock in you that a slower process might not?

    SINE: It opened up a deeply creative and impulsive way of writing and producing.
    I consciously allowed small imperfections to remain, without approaching things too perfectionistically.
    Letting go of genre boundaries.

    In this way, I believe a very honest album came into being.

    Q: You described the process as a “meditative flow”—diving in every morning and letting yourself drift. Was there a moment during the production where everything clicked—or a point where you thought the concept might not translate into a finished album?

    SINE: No, that moment didn’t really happen.
    I can imagine creating another album in a similar way at some point.
    Impuls is already a little while behind me, and since then I’ve released new songs, with more new music currently in the making.

    I feel the core idea behind it has only grown stronger over time.
    The newer pieces are also based on this same principle.

    Personal & Creativity

    SINE
    SINE

    Q: Impuls is also a conscious change in your setup: you switched off the familiar groovebox/sampler workflow and created the album with software instruments and DAW mixing—while bringing in many real instruments (guitars, bass, harmonica, accordion, felt piano, drums, and more). What made you choose that path—and what did it do to the sound and the decisions you made?

    SINE: I simply wanted to try something new.
    To step away from the MPC and return more toward classic audio recording — like in the old days with an eight-track tape machine.
    So at the beginning of each session, I used the DAW purely for recording audio, whether capturing a guitar riff or playing simple synth lines.
    These recordings always became the starting point of the tracks.

    I don’t think it really changed the sound itself.
    In today’s digital world, the sonic quality is already on a very high level — whether on the MPC or inside a DAW.
    It was more the way of working that shifted slightly.

    Q: Many of these instruments go back to your childhood. What’s the personal connection there—and did working this way change how “close” the music felt to you?

    SINE: Well, I naturally have a very special connection to the guitar.
    I would still call it my favorite instrument.
    My PRS electric guitar is more than twenty years old now, and it has been through a lot with me — which creates a quiet bond.

    Without a guitar, tracks almost feel a little unfamiliar to me.
    After all, it was where everything began.
    My very first guitar was a gift from my father.

    Q: You intentionally didn’t think about whether tracks would generate a lot of streams—you focused on authenticity. In today’s music landscape, that’s a strong stance. How do you protect that mindset when the outside world can be loud?

    SINE: I often feel that there is already more than enough inauthentic music in the world.
    If I manage to stay fully with myself, to let things flow calmly, and to gently switch off the outside noise, then I know I’m on the right path.
    It’s almost like turning my mind off — and in that space, SINE begins to emerge naturally from within me.

    And to remain open to the new.
    To try unfamiliar things and keep moving forward.
    Yet always staying close to myself.

    Inspiration & Listening

    SINE
    SINE

    Q: Which artists or albums have inspired you most recently—and what did they spark in you (composition, atmosphere, sound design, use of instruments, emotional pacing)?

    SINE: Oh, interesting question.
    These days I actually find myself listening to a lot of older music again.

    From Led Zeppelin and Pearl Jam to Sigur Rós, but also Massive Attack and Portishead…
    And of course,
    one of my all-time favorite albums: Spirit of Eden by Talk Talk.

    Q: If you could recommend one piece of music—any genre—that everyone should listen to at least once, what would it be (and why that one)?

    SINE: Maybe “After the Flood” by Talk Talk, from my second favorite album, Laughing Stock.
    A truly beautiful ten-minute dream journey.

    Creative Philosophy & Vision

    Q: Impuls sounds deeper, more expansive, a bit more unpolished—yet still meditative and varied. What role do imperfection and “rough edges” play in your music—especially in ambient, where things can easily become too smooth?

    SINE: A very important role.
    And with Impuls, I allowed myself to fully embrace it.
    Imperfection and rough edges make everything feel human — and also unique and authentic.

    Q: If there were no limits—no budget, deadlines, or technical restrictions—what would your dream project be right now? (For example: an instrument-heavy ambient record, a film/series score, a live concept with real instruments, an immersive format release, or something completely unexpected.)

    SINE: Simply retreating for a few months to a small house in Italy.
    Surrounded by my guitars and effect pedals, accordion, and other acoustic instruments, a few microphones, and an analog eight-track tape machine — letting purely acoustic pieces come to life.

    From Silence to Sound – Creative Identity

    Q: I often explore how personal decisions shape a musician’s signature sound. Which choices do you feel most strongly define your sound—your sense of space, your instrument palette, your relationship to rhythm, your production aesthetics?

    SINE: Are these truly conscious decisions, or rather unconscious inner impulses and preferences — perhaps also listening experiences from the past?
    I believe the most important thing is to begin the journey toward yourself, and to trust yourself along the way.
    From there, your own sound will naturally reveal itself.

    Q: With a long arc from Cross That Line to Ruhepol, Tiefblau, Einklang (including immersive releases), and the guitar-focused Tiefgang EP—what have been the most important turning points that changed how you make music?

    SINE: Hmm… in a way, every album or EP has been a turning point for me.
    I have always tried to be authentically SINE.

    But perhaps Tiefgang was truly something special.
    Purely acoustic, without any embellishment.
    It showed me that it doesn’t take much at all to express myself through music — even in the most acoustic, reduced form.

    Closing

    Q: What do you hope listeners feel or take away when they spend time with Impuls—especially on days when they need calm, focus, or a reset?

    SINE: I hope listeners simply have a beautiful moment with the music.
    That they can dive deeply within, that gentle memories may surface, or that they feel emotionally touched in some quiet way.

    Just listening.
    Just feeling.

    Q: If you could give one piece of advice to someone at the beginning of their creative journey—especially someone navigating doubt, comparison, or a “silent phase”—what would it be?

    SINE: Try to follow your own path, to find your sound and trust in it.
    Allow yourself to explore, to try new things, and to trust what truly resonates with you — then bring it into the world.

    The world needs every creative soul more than ever.

    Q: Finally: what’s next for you after Impuls—are you curious to go further down this software-based, instrument-rich path, return to a more haptic workflow, explore more guitar-led ambient, or open a completely new chapter?

    SINE: We’ll see.
    I think there will definitely be a lot of acoustic elements ahead — very organic and truly handmade.

    Thank you, Thomas.
    This was a real pleasure.

  • Andreas Bach Interview: Andreas Bach on Guitar as a Voice, Creative Contrast, and Keeping Music Human

    Andreas Bach Interview: Andreas Bach on Guitar as a Voice, Creative Contrast, and Keeping Music Human

    Andreas Bach is a versatile guitarist, producer, and guitar teacher from Osnabrück, Germany, known for warm tones and calming melodies shaped by years on stage and in the studio. Rooted in guitar-driven rock yet inspired by atmospheric worlds in the spirit of Sigur Rós, Esbjörn Svensson, and Pink Floyd, he blends crafted guitar sound with subtle electronics into intimate, cinematic ambient/downtempo pieces. He’s also the author of Beginner’s Guitar (SCHOTT Music), bringing the same clarity and musical sensitivity to his teaching and writing.

    Andreas Bach
    Andreas Bach

    The Interview

    Introduction

    Q: For those who don’t know you yet: how would you describe yourself as an artist today—especially the role of the guitar as your “voice”?

    Andreas: It’s always difficult to talk about yourself. A brief summary would be: I’m a musician, and my main instrument is the guitar—I’ve been playing it for 30 years. It’s naturally my primary voice, but I also like to try anything I can get my hands on. I love many different genres and tend to take something I enjoy from each of them and weave it into my own music.

    Q: You’re active in very different worlds: ambient/downtempo production on one side, and high-energy live bands on the other. What does each world give you—and what do you take from one into the other?

    Andreas: I have a lot of different sides, and I enjoy contrasts. I love spending hours in the studio crafting calm, atmospheric music—but I also enjoy playing super-heavy rock. One side brings stillness and feels almost like meditation; the other is all about volume, power, and energy.

    Latest Work

    Q: You’ve released solo material and collaborations, and you’ve also worked closely with Thomas Lemmer. How does your mindset change when you create alone versus when you create as a duo?

    Andreas: When collaborating, I always try to get into a flow and bounce ideas back and forth. One person has a small idea, which sparks a new one in me. Each of us can bring something the other can’t—and it goes back and forth. I call it “ping-pong creativity.”

    When I work alone, I don’t need that in the same way. I usually have a very clear idea in my head, and I don’t want anyone to interrupt the process—because I already feel it’s right for me, and I know it will turn out well in the end.

    Creative Approach

    Q: When a new track starts: what usually comes first for you—tone and texture, a chord progression, a melodic hook, a groove, or a specific emotion?

    Andreas: Everything and nothing. I don’t have a fixed system. I can be inspired very quickly by the smallest things: a sound, a beat, a new chord, or even just a specific tempo. Once my brain is fired up, it doesn’t stop so quickly.

    Q: Your guitar sound feels carefully shaped. How do you approach tone-building: fingers vs. pick, dynamics, pedals/amps, layering, and the decision of when a part should stay raw versus processed?

    Andreas: I really like thick and warm guitar sounds—players like David Gilmour and Jimi Hendrix are my heroes. But of course, the tone has to fit the arrangement. So I always try to shape the sound to suit the song. That’s the main goal.

    Andreas Bach
    Andreas Bach

    Personal & Creativity

    Q: You studied guitar and also teach and write about the instrument. How has formal learning—and later teaching—changed your creativity?

    Andreas: I love diving deeply into these topics. I’m always discovering new things that interest me and that I want to learn. Even when I’m teaching a student something, I want to know exactly what I’m talking about so I can explain it well—so you’re constantly working on yourself. Many students also inspire me to explore new ideas. For me, being open-minded definitely fuels creativity.

    Q: On stage, you’re playing music that people instantly recognize; in ambient/downtempo, you’re shaping a mood that is more personal and abstract. What does “authenticity” mean to you across these two extremes?

    Andreas: Yes, true—I play in very different genres. For many people, those seem to contradict each other. Not for me. I just love the variety, and in the end it’s all music. There are only two cases: either I like it or I don’t. The main goal is always to move people with music.

    Andreas Bach
    Andreas Bach

    Q: When self-doubt or creative silence shows up: what helps you move through it? Do you reach for the guitar, the studio, a walk, a routine—what actually works?

    Andreas: Listening to new music. Picking up a new instrument. Collaborating with other people. Or doing something completely unrelated to music for a few days. It always comes back.

    Inspiration & Listening

    Q: What inspires you most right now—other musicians, films, games, places, books, daily life? And how does that inspiration translate into sound?

    Andreas: For me it’s almost always the same: listening to new music and really immersing myself in it—and making music with cool, creative people.

    Q: If you could recommend one piece of music—any genre—that everyone should listen to at least once, what would it be (and why that one)?

    Andreas: It changes all the time for me. But at the moment, I’m really into Ólafur Arnalds (an Icelandic composer somewhere between neoclassical and ambient). Give “Þú ert jörðin” a listen—what a beautiful little composition. Minimalistic, soulful, and deeply touching.

    Creative Philosophy & Vision

    Q: In ambient/downtempo, the line between “beautiful” and “boring” can be thin. How do you keep your music emotionally alive—without overfilling it?

    Andreas: Finding good melodies. Finding nice and interesting sounds. Not overproducing, but still paying attention to cool little details. Avoiding too much copy & paste. Finding an original style that hasn’t been heard a thousand times before. Keeping the music human and natural.

    Q: If there were no limits—no budget, deadlines, or technical restrictions—what would your dream project be right now?

    Andreas: For example: locking myself away with Ólafur Arnalds somewhere in Iceland and composing an album together. Experiencing magnificent nature and getting inspired.

    From Silence to Sound – Creative Identity

    Q: Looking back, what were the biggest turning points that changed how you make music?

    Andreas: Learning how to record myself—and learning how to produce.

    Closing

    Q: When someone listens to your ambient/downtempo music, what do you hope it gives them—calm, focus, comfort, energy, a sense of story, something else?

    Andreas: It should always touch the listener in some way—so they stay tuned in and want to hear more.

    Q: If you could give one piece of advice to someone at the beginning of their creative journey—especially someone navigating doubt or a “silent phase”—what would it be?

    Andreas: If you enjoy it, just do it—do it for yourself. Finish your songs. It gets a little better each time. Don’t compare yourself to others. Everything else will gradually fall into place on its own.

    Andreas Bach
    Andreas Bach

    Q: Finally: what’s next for you?

    Andreas: I’m already working on new songs of my own, and new collaborations are planned again.